Cold case season 3 episode 1
Curb Your Enthusiasm
2009.11.17 08:57 IWatchTooMuchTV Curb Your Enthusiasm
A subreddit for the HBO show "Curb Your Enthusiasm"
2013.09.10 16:28 Cuervoso Their last resort
Netflix TV series 'Ozark', starring Jason Bateman & Laura Linney
2013.06.26 17:14 Orwell84 Plata o Plomo
Discussion of the Netflix original series "Narcos" & "Narcos Mexico"
2023.06.01 03:44 UnlikelyFail1827 Need advice after being rejected for an auto loan
Attempted and failed to secure financing for a 30k vehicle at a well-known dealer.
Some background:
- First time buyer, paid for cars with hard cash before. Lost my vehicle in Dec 2022 that had just been paid off.
- Score: 800, now 795 due to hard inquiry
- Income: Self employed, making 4-5k/mo, provable if required via bank statements and tax returns
- Debt: 1.5-2k total across all lines, DTI ratio under 3%. 5 active CC's limits with ranging from 5k to 9k, 1 LOC from PP.
- History: Never missed payments, utilization is under 2%. 10 yr total history.
- Down payment: 7k
Talked to finance professional at dealer, they couldn't disclose why I was denied but I believe I may have asked for "too much" just based off our conversation. Hesitant to try again as I don't want to damage my credit further with more rejections. What does one do in this scenario? Co-borroweco-signing is out of the question. I can probably put more down in a month or so but I need something now.
My current options are:
- Buy a beater in full and pray to god that it doesn't have issues
- Finance through a BHPH and pay off the car ASAP.
Additional question: Do I HAVE to finance a vehicle to prove ability to pay back an installment loan if in the case I wish to obtain a mortgage in the future? Most research I've done suggests no but I am honestly lost when it comes to credit and how to actually utilize it. I'd honestly be happy just paying in cash and avoiding using credit especially with the crazy interest rates IF it's doable without affecting my future ability to request "big" loans.
submitted by UnlikelyFail1827 to personalfinance [link] [comments]
Some background:
- First time buyer, paid for cars with hard cash before. Lost my vehicle in Dec 2022 that had just been paid off.
- Score: 800, now 795 due to hard inquiry
- Income: Self employed, making 4-5k/mo, provable if required via bank statements and tax returns
- Debt: 1.5-2k total across all lines, DTI ratio under 3%. 5 active CC's limits with ranging from 5k to 9k, 1 LOC from PP.
- History: Never missed payments, utilization is under 2%. 10 yr total history.
- Down payment: 7k
Talked to finance professional at dealer, they couldn't disclose why I was denied but I believe I may have asked for "too much" just based off our conversation. Hesitant to try again as I don't want to damage my credit further with more rejections. What does one do in this scenario? Co-borroweco-signing is out of the question. I can probably put more down in a month or so but I need something now.
My current options are:
- Buy a beater in full and pray to god that it doesn't have issues
- Finance through a BHPH and pay off the car ASAP.
Additional question: Do I HAVE to finance a vehicle to prove ability to pay back an installment loan if in the case I wish to obtain a mortgage in the future? Most research I've done suggests no but I am honestly lost when it comes to credit and how to actually utilize it. I'd honestly be happy just paying in cash and avoiding using credit especially with the crazy interest rates IF it's doable without affecting my future ability to request "big" loans.
2023.06.01 03:44 AlfredoThayerMahan Beyond the Lightspeed Horizon: Carrier Doctrine in a Galaxy Far Far Away
Between May 4th and May 8th 1942, the first naval battle that occured beyond the visual horizon took place. While the Battle of The Coral Sea was somewhat indecisive, with both the Japanese and Americans seeing significant losses although the Japanese largely ceded the body of water thereafter, the kind of engagement it typified bears remembrance, one where neither side directly sighted each-other with surface vessels. You cannot hit what you cannot see, a lesson the Japanese learned all too well a month later near a small sandy dot called “Midway”.
Eighty years hence and the lesson remains the same. It doesn’t matter how impressive or unstoppable your weapon is, if you do not know what you are shooting at, it is useless. Where in the past scout planes would make visual contact with the enemy, tools like RORSATs, NOSS, SOSUS, Over The Horizon and Synthetic Aperture Radars, and more have become the staple for detecting, classifying, and tracking contacts.
The mistake common among most people and even military enthusiasts is to assume the greatest weapon a carrier has in its defense is its fighters. Consider the Survivability Onion (not pictured). While this statement can be somewhat true, from a certain point of view, the carrier’s ability to detect the threat via their AWACs, and the ability to attack beyond the visual horizon is its greatest defense. Both of these steps allow the Carrier to remain hidden. In most cases it is fairly easy to track a Battleship that has come to shell you. Even if it is doing so beyond the horizon, counter-battery radar can give you a good picture of its location just based on the trajectory of its shells, potentially good enough to fire a spread of anti-ship missiles at it. By using deceptive return paths, a carrier can make such tracking more difficult, not to mention more dangerous with a CAP.
To remain hidden is what keeps ships alive. Spaceborne ISR platforms have stripped this fog of war back somewhat, but the basic concept of the horizon is critical to understanding how to utilize carriers in Star Wars.
Putting the “A” in “CVA”
There are a number of real life carrier doctrines to consider as each approached usage slightly differently. NATO nations, led by the United States, viewed the carrier as largely an offensive tool. Of the three major NATO carrier nations, the U.S., the U.K., and France, the U.K. would eventually lose it’s offensive capability with the retirement of the last of the Audacious and Centaur Class carriers and their Phantom and Buccaneer aircraft while France would maintain the offensive role of their carriers though to a more limited capacity due to simply having fewer of them. That being said, outside of the U.S. for much of the Cold War and early 21st century, carriers were largely used as a method of ASW and point-defense interception. For the Soviets this was their Kiev Class with Yak-38 and Yak-141 interceptors and rotary wing ASW and AWACs aircraft, meant to protect their SSBN Bastions from hounding P-3 Orions and NATO SSNs. Even the later Kuznetsov, if it ever actually works, is a defensive tool with the aircraft largely lacking in the capability to attack targets. For the Brits the effect of their transition was demonstrated in the Falklands where Harriers constituted much of their fleet air defense but lacked the range, speed, and loiter time to perform fully in the “Outer Air Battle” or to perform much in the way of strike or air support.
This difference is best illustrated by the designation American Fleet Carriers possessed for a time, CVA*, the “Attack” Carrier. CVA is not a physical change in an aircraft carrier, CVs were changed to CVAs and back again depending on era, rather it denotes its usage. This originated in early nuclear weapon doctrine where carriers were viewed as forward airfields to launch nuclear strikes into the Soviet Union. Later this evolved to attacking the SSBN Bastion in the Barents Sea along with targets on the Kola Peninsula with a similar arrangement with the Sea of Okhotsk and Kamchatka Peninsula in the Pacific.
To further understand this, it is important to look at the kinds of aircraft used by the U.S. Carriers and Supercarriers, most importantly their attack aircraft. The first of the long-range attack trend was the AJ Savage, meant as the first dedicated carrier nuclear delivery platform, with a range longer than the B-25. This trend continued with other dedicated nuclear delivery platforms such as the A-3 Skywarrior and A-5 Vigilante, with notable exception in the small A-4 Skyhawk but a trend which culminated in the A-6 Intruder and later Tomcat Quickstrike proposal.
So why bother? Why should such long-range strike platforms be developed even if they are going to attack relatively coastal installations? Well the answer is simple. Range is the carrier’s best armor but it comes at a cost. The longer the range the less ordinance an aircraft can carry, needing external fuel tanks. Maybe they need buddy tankers which reduces your strike force. Either way you are doing less damage and hitting fewer point targets. By using larger aircraft you can compensate for this, not needing to sacrifice pylons for fuel stores. At the same time by being far away you are harder to detect and engage. Both by shore installations and by reconnaissance aircraft. If they can only search X number of square kilometers per hour, by increasing that area you reduce the likelihood of being found by simple probability. With that kind of safety a carrier can be used in a high-intensity offensive capacity without undue risk to it. Sure, you could load up a Harrier with drop tanks and daisy chain buddy tankers to achieve the same range as an A-6 but the A-6 could probably do it without needing to sacrifice much in terms of payload, of which it carries far more and without or with only limited tankers support, freeing up more aircraft to carry out tasks. One is a gimmick, the other is an offensive tool.
*CVA is not a U.S. exclusive term, indeed the ill-fated British CVA-01 program bore the same designator.
Hyperspace: The Great Equalizer
In Star Wars, starfighters have two clear categories. Those with hyperdrives and those without. A starfighter with a hyperdrive is much like a long-range aircraft such as an F-14 or A-6, even if the crew requirements and footprint are nothing alike. An A-Wing has more in common with a Tomcat in this respect than a Tie-Bomber does, even if the Tie-Bomber was loaded up with anti-starfighter missiles. Those without hyperdrives are your Harriers or Yak-38 equivalents, limited in range and largely relegated to point defense.
Hyperspace creates a horizon behind which a carrier can hide. Simply a jump or two away and off the major hyperspace lanes, and they are beyond sensors and effectively untouchable unless the enemy has thousands of probes to search every nook and cranny you may have hidden. At the same time, if the carrier has hyperspace capable starfighters they have the ability to hit any given target within a fairly massive bubble with impunity and with a relatively low transit time. Conversely, if you were to use spacecraft without hyperdrives to attack a target you would leave the carrier detectable and thus vulnerable to attack by the enemy, losing the greatest advantage of a carrier: its stealth.
Consequently this is why hybrid Carrier-Battleship approaches in real life and in Sci-Fi generally fall short. To act as a Battleship, the Carrier gives up its stealth. There is a minor exception where the fighters are used to augment the air-defense of the "Battle-Carrier" rather than as offensive tools but this is the exception that makes the rule. Ironically, this exception makes the TIE fighter a good design for the Imperial Class to carry as the Star Destroyer doesn’t lose much by getting within detection range of a target while having smaller and cheaper starfighters to augment its air-defense.
To properly utilize a dedicated carrier with Hyperspace technology, not only should they be at the back of the formation, but the carriers should be completely disconnected from the ongoing conventional battle, operating in an entirely different region of space.
The Air Defense Problem
In real life the air defense of a battlegroup can largely be divided into three sections.
First is the outer air battle. This task is carried out by the Defensive Counter-Air Combat Air Patrol (DCA-CAP) ranged out along the threat axis to destroy the enemy force before they either detect the Battlegroup or get within their weapons employment zone. This task is supplemented by extremely long-range Surface to Air Missiles such as SM-6, with several Cold War programs going so far as to propose a Surface-to-Air Boost-Glide Vehicle (LORAINE) to hit scouting aircraft at over 500 nautical miles away. Additionally use of SAM traps, ships that are not emitting and have targeting cued off of other platforms such as fighters and AWACs, further supplements the use of fighters in this theater of operations. Obviously these SAM platforms are at risk but the most valuable unit of a battlegroup is the carrier so the potential sacrifice of one is seen as a worthwhile trade if it can break an incoming raid.
Moving on we have the inner air battle, or area air-defense, which is within detection range by the enemy force and typically within their weapon employment zones. This is handled by the fighters that are assigned to point-defense and by the medium range SAM systems such as RIM-66 and earlier versions of RIM-67*, SM-2MR and SM-2ER respectively. Oftentimes this is typically engaging weapons such as incoming anti-ship missiles.
Finally is the point-defense arena where weapons such as CIWS and ESSM take play and is exclusively, with a few exceptions, dedicated to engaging incoming weapons and largely centered around the self-protection of the ship in question.
The ranges for these engagement envelopes are highly dependent, variable based on range of enemy detection, range of your own sensors, range of weapons, and other factors.
Star Wars complicates the matters somewhat with how Hyperspace interferes with the situation. For this we must first divide the situation into two independent bubbles of space. First is the space around the enemy installation, ship, carrier, etc, and second is the space around your own battlegroup.
In general, the entirety of your own bubble of space is the “inner-air battle”. In this area your point-defense fighters can engage the enemy along with most of your defensive systems depending on how you interpret the range of weapons in Star Wars. At the same time the enemy can detect you and there’s a good chance you are within their own weapons employment zone if you can hit them.
So where is the “outer-air battle” in this scenario? Well that’s complicated. Typically the thinking is that you intercept the enemy force as they try to make their way to you. The problem is, in Star Wars this is impossible to do in hyperspace without specific tools. This tool is an Interdictor vessel. Such a vessel, if placed along the threat axis, would prematurely pull the enemy force out of hyperspace, allowing you to engage with your own hyperspace capable fighters while not putting your own force at risk. Of course the Interdictor is at risk, much like the AAW ship in a SAM trap but that is a calculated risk that must be made to force an engagement that isn’t ideal for the enemy.
There is an obvious issue with this usage. You don’t know where the enemy force is going to come from if they are willing to probe around for alternative hyperspace routings. This makes your chances of actually intercepting them exceedingly low as they aren’t really operating on limited fuel unless you’re engaging forces halfway across the Galaxy and even then it would be easy to take other hyperspace routes to avoid your interdictor screen. So, with general standoff defensive measures void, logically the best defense in case of a Raid Warning is to simply go to hyperspace and make a couple jumps to a pre-planned secondary or tertiary location thus voiding any targeting information provided by the enemy ISR. In this respect detection of a carrier group would be hard but pinning them and attacking them if an Interdictor isn’t immediately available is basically impossible.
As a result the traditional Outer-Air Battle, in the vast expanses of space between the enemy airbase and your own carrier, doesn’t really have the opportunity to take place. However, there is one place you know the enemy force will be, around their own carriers/airbase. This is the equivalent of a U.S. carrier force sending F-14s to blast Backfires over the Kola Peninsula. Not impossible but generally ill-advised as now the enemy can use all their fighters, long-range and point-defense while you only have access to your long-range fighters.
At this point, if you are getting that close to the enemy you might as well engage their carriers to more efficiently destroy their strike generation capability. This turns the Defensive Counter-Air (Counter-space? IDK, I’m going to stick with the Earthling lingo) mission into an Offensive Counter-Air mission where you compensate for your lower numbers by hitting them on the ground or in the ship. This divides yourself into two kinds of engagements. First is protecting your own fleet before they get to hyperspace and second is to attack and destroy the enemy fleet before they go to hyperspace.
This gets to the problem of invading or for that matter, defending a planet. If you park your carrier in a planet’s orbit you are reducing the volume you could be into a tiny pinprick, you’ve basically done half the enemy’s targeting for them. Even worse, depending on how close you are, you may not be able to go to hyperspace immediately, meaning that disengagement could be impossible at the worst time. You may as well have a land base as at least that would be more survivable in the kinetic sense and be easier to work on than a ship.
*Later versions of the RIM-67 and the RIM-156 (also designated SM-2ER though this was launched from the Mk-41 VLS instead of the older twin-arm launchers that the RIM-67 used), would employ active radar and terminal IR seekers. This allowed engagement beyond the horizon against low-flying targets based on cuing by AWACs, potentially into the range where it would fall into the Outer Air Battle.
Conclusions:
Hyperspace creates a unique set of circumstances that make offensive action against fixed positions/fleets very easy while making mobile and evasive battlegroups very difficult to engage. This sort of doctrine is best seen in the Rebel Alliance and their employment of hyperspace capable fighters, striking with relative impunity at Imperial targets without risking their major fleet assets. There is no reason this cannot scale up to major Galactic powers as it provides a disproportionate offensive and defensive capability for the practitioners of the doctrine.
submitted by AlfredoThayerMahan to MawInstallation [link] [comments]
Eighty years hence and the lesson remains the same. It doesn’t matter how impressive or unstoppable your weapon is, if you do not know what you are shooting at, it is useless. Where in the past scout planes would make visual contact with the enemy, tools like RORSATs, NOSS, SOSUS, Over The Horizon and Synthetic Aperture Radars, and more have become the staple for detecting, classifying, and tracking contacts.
The mistake common among most people and even military enthusiasts is to assume the greatest weapon a carrier has in its defense is its fighters. Consider the Survivability Onion (not pictured). While this statement can be somewhat true, from a certain point of view, the carrier’s ability to detect the threat via their AWACs, and the ability to attack beyond the visual horizon is its greatest defense. Both of these steps allow the Carrier to remain hidden. In most cases it is fairly easy to track a Battleship that has come to shell you. Even if it is doing so beyond the horizon, counter-battery radar can give you a good picture of its location just based on the trajectory of its shells, potentially good enough to fire a spread of anti-ship missiles at it. By using deceptive return paths, a carrier can make such tracking more difficult, not to mention more dangerous with a CAP.
To remain hidden is what keeps ships alive. Spaceborne ISR platforms have stripped this fog of war back somewhat, but the basic concept of the horizon is critical to understanding how to utilize carriers in Star Wars.
Putting the “A” in “CVA”
There are a number of real life carrier doctrines to consider as each approached usage slightly differently. NATO nations, led by the United States, viewed the carrier as largely an offensive tool. Of the three major NATO carrier nations, the U.S., the U.K., and France, the U.K. would eventually lose it’s offensive capability with the retirement of the last of the Audacious and Centaur Class carriers and their Phantom and Buccaneer aircraft while France would maintain the offensive role of their carriers though to a more limited capacity due to simply having fewer of them. That being said, outside of the U.S. for much of the Cold War and early 21st century, carriers were largely used as a method of ASW and point-defense interception. For the Soviets this was their Kiev Class with Yak-38 and Yak-141 interceptors and rotary wing ASW and AWACs aircraft, meant to protect their SSBN Bastions from hounding P-3 Orions and NATO SSNs. Even the later Kuznetsov, if it ever actually works, is a defensive tool with the aircraft largely lacking in the capability to attack targets. For the Brits the effect of their transition was demonstrated in the Falklands where Harriers constituted much of their fleet air defense but lacked the range, speed, and loiter time to perform fully in the “Outer Air Battle” or to perform much in the way of strike or air support.
This difference is best illustrated by the designation American Fleet Carriers possessed for a time, CVA*, the “Attack” Carrier. CVA is not a physical change in an aircraft carrier, CVs were changed to CVAs and back again depending on era, rather it denotes its usage. This originated in early nuclear weapon doctrine where carriers were viewed as forward airfields to launch nuclear strikes into the Soviet Union. Later this evolved to attacking the SSBN Bastion in the Barents Sea along with targets on the Kola Peninsula with a similar arrangement with the Sea of Okhotsk and Kamchatka Peninsula in the Pacific.
To further understand this, it is important to look at the kinds of aircraft used by the U.S. Carriers and Supercarriers, most importantly their attack aircraft. The first of the long-range attack trend was the AJ Savage, meant as the first dedicated carrier nuclear delivery platform, with a range longer than the B-25. This trend continued with other dedicated nuclear delivery platforms such as the A-3 Skywarrior and A-5 Vigilante, with notable exception in the small A-4 Skyhawk but a trend which culminated in the A-6 Intruder and later Tomcat Quickstrike proposal.
So why bother? Why should such long-range strike platforms be developed even if they are going to attack relatively coastal installations? Well the answer is simple. Range is the carrier’s best armor but it comes at a cost. The longer the range the less ordinance an aircraft can carry, needing external fuel tanks. Maybe they need buddy tankers which reduces your strike force. Either way you are doing less damage and hitting fewer point targets. By using larger aircraft you can compensate for this, not needing to sacrifice pylons for fuel stores. At the same time by being far away you are harder to detect and engage. Both by shore installations and by reconnaissance aircraft. If they can only search X number of square kilometers per hour, by increasing that area you reduce the likelihood of being found by simple probability. With that kind of safety a carrier can be used in a high-intensity offensive capacity without undue risk to it. Sure, you could load up a Harrier with drop tanks and daisy chain buddy tankers to achieve the same range as an A-6 but the A-6 could probably do it without needing to sacrifice much in terms of payload, of which it carries far more and without or with only limited tankers support, freeing up more aircraft to carry out tasks. One is a gimmick, the other is an offensive tool.
*CVA is not a U.S. exclusive term, indeed the ill-fated British CVA-01 program bore the same designator.
Hyperspace: The Great Equalizer
In Star Wars, starfighters have two clear categories. Those with hyperdrives and those without. A starfighter with a hyperdrive is much like a long-range aircraft such as an F-14 or A-6, even if the crew requirements and footprint are nothing alike. An A-Wing has more in common with a Tomcat in this respect than a Tie-Bomber does, even if the Tie-Bomber was loaded up with anti-starfighter missiles. Those without hyperdrives are your Harriers or Yak-38 equivalents, limited in range and largely relegated to point defense.
Hyperspace creates a horizon behind which a carrier can hide. Simply a jump or two away and off the major hyperspace lanes, and they are beyond sensors and effectively untouchable unless the enemy has thousands of probes to search every nook and cranny you may have hidden. At the same time, if the carrier has hyperspace capable starfighters they have the ability to hit any given target within a fairly massive bubble with impunity and with a relatively low transit time. Conversely, if you were to use spacecraft without hyperdrives to attack a target you would leave the carrier detectable and thus vulnerable to attack by the enemy, losing the greatest advantage of a carrier: its stealth.
Consequently this is why hybrid Carrier-Battleship approaches in real life and in Sci-Fi generally fall short. To act as a Battleship, the Carrier gives up its stealth. There is a minor exception where the fighters are used to augment the air-defense of the "Battle-Carrier" rather than as offensive tools but this is the exception that makes the rule. Ironically, this exception makes the TIE fighter a good design for the Imperial Class to carry as the Star Destroyer doesn’t lose much by getting within detection range of a target while having smaller and cheaper starfighters to augment its air-defense.
To properly utilize a dedicated carrier with Hyperspace technology, not only should they be at the back of the formation, but the carriers should be completely disconnected from the ongoing conventional battle, operating in an entirely different region of space.
The Air Defense Problem
In real life the air defense of a battlegroup can largely be divided into three sections.
First is the outer air battle. This task is carried out by the Defensive Counter-Air Combat Air Patrol (DCA-CAP) ranged out along the threat axis to destroy the enemy force before they either detect the Battlegroup or get within their weapons employment zone. This task is supplemented by extremely long-range Surface to Air Missiles such as SM-6, with several Cold War programs going so far as to propose a Surface-to-Air Boost-Glide Vehicle (LORAINE) to hit scouting aircraft at over 500 nautical miles away. Additionally use of SAM traps, ships that are not emitting and have targeting cued off of other platforms such as fighters and AWACs, further supplements the use of fighters in this theater of operations. Obviously these SAM platforms are at risk but the most valuable unit of a battlegroup is the carrier so the potential sacrifice of one is seen as a worthwhile trade if it can break an incoming raid.
Moving on we have the inner air battle, or area air-defense, which is within detection range by the enemy force and typically within their weapon employment zones. This is handled by the fighters that are assigned to point-defense and by the medium range SAM systems such as RIM-66 and earlier versions of RIM-67*, SM-2MR and SM-2ER respectively. Oftentimes this is typically engaging weapons such as incoming anti-ship missiles.
Finally is the point-defense arena where weapons such as CIWS and ESSM take play and is exclusively, with a few exceptions, dedicated to engaging incoming weapons and largely centered around the self-protection of the ship in question.
The ranges for these engagement envelopes are highly dependent, variable based on range of enemy detection, range of your own sensors, range of weapons, and other factors.
Star Wars complicates the matters somewhat with how Hyperspace interferes with the situation. For this we must first divide the situation into two independent bubbles of space. First is the space around the enemy installation, ship, carrier, etc, and second is the space around your own battlegroup.
In general, the entirety of your own bubble of space is the “inner-air battle”. In this area your point-defense fighters can engage the enemy along with most of your defensive systems depending on how you interpret the range of weapons in Star Wars. At the same time the enemy can detect you and there’s a good chance you are within their own weapons employment zone if you can hit them.
So where is the “outer-air battle” in this scenario? Well that’s complicated. Typically the thinking is that you intercept the enemy force as they try to make their way to you. The problem is, in Star Wars this is impossible to do in hyperspace without specific tools. This tool is an Interdictor vessel. Such a vessel, if placed along the threat axis, would prematurely pull the enemy force out of hyperspace, allowing you to engage with your own hyperspace capable fighters while not putting your own force at risk. Of course the Interdictor is at risk, much like the AAW ship in a SAM trap but that is a calculated risk that must be made to force an engagement that isn’t ideal for the enemy.
There is an obvious issue with this usage. You don’t know where the enemy force is going to come from if they are willing to probe around for alternative hyperspace routings. This makes your chances of actually intercepting them exceedingly low as they aren’t really operating on limited fuel unless you’re engaging forces halfway across the Galaxy and even then it would be easy to take other hyperspace routes to avoid your interdictor screen. So, with general standoff defensive measures void, logically the best defense in case of a Raid Warning is to simply go to hyperspace and make a couple jumps to a pre-planned secondary or tertiary location thus voiding any targeting information provided by the enemy ISR. In this respect detection of a carrier group would be hard but pinning them and attacking them if an Interdictor isn’t immediately available is basically impossible.
As a result the traditional Outer-Air Battle, in the vast expanses of space between the enemy airbase and your own carrier, doesn’t really have the opportunity to take place. However, there is one place you know the enemy force will be, around their own carriers/airbase. This is the equivalent of a U.S. carrier force sending F-14s to blast Backfires over the Kola Peninsula. Not impossible but generally ill-advised as now the enemy can use all their fighters, long-range and point-defense while you only have access to your long-range fighters.
At this point, if you are getting that close to the enemy you might as well engage their carriers to more efficiently destroy their strike generation capability. This turns the Defensive Counter-Air (Counter-space? IDK, I’m going to stick with the Earthling lingo) mission into an Offensive Counter-Air mission where you compensate for your lower numbers by hitting them on the ground or in the ship. This divides yourself into two kinds of engagements. First is protecting your own fleet before they get to hyperspace and second is to attack and destroy the enemy fleet before they go to hyperspace.
This gets to the problem of invading or for that matter, defending a planet. If you park your carrier in a planet’s orbit you are reducing the volume you could be into a tiny pinprick, you’ve basically done half the enemy’s targeting for them. Even worse, depending on how close you are, you may not be able to go to hyperspace immediately, meaning that disengagement could be impossible at the worst time. You may as well have a land base as at least that would be more survivable in the kinetic sense and be easier to work on than a ship.
*Later versions of the RIM-67 and the RIM-156 (also designated SM-2ER though this was launched from the Mk-41 VLS instead of the older twin-arm launchers that the RIM-67 used), would employ active radar and terminal IR seekers. This allowed engagement beyond the horizon against low-flying targets based on cuing by AWACs, potentially into the range where it would fall into the Outer Air Battle.
Conclusions:
Hyperspace creates a unique set of circumstances that make offensive action against fixed positions/fleets very easy while making mobile and evasive battlegroups very difficult to engage. This sort of doctrine is best seen in the Rebel Alliance and their employment of hyperspace capable fighters, striking with relative impunity at Imperial targets without risking their major fleet assets. There is no reason this cannot scale up to major Galactic powers as it provides a disproportionate offensive and defensive capability for the practitioners of the doctrine.
2023.06.01 03:43 j4twell7 Finally hit 40,000
 | Stoked on finally breaking 40,000 season rep. It seemed like getting to gold league was way harder this time though so I think I played way more MP. submitted by j4twell7 to Asphalt9 [link] [comments] |
2023.06.01 03:42 seekerblackout [2013 News] Scott Riggs injured in Charlotte crash, will miss multiple races
Scott Riggs will miss "multiple weeks" of competition after injuries sustained in a vicious crash early in the Coca-Cola 600, where his Stanley Tools Chevrolet took an extremely hard hit to the inside SAFER barrier and then was drilled in the driver side door by Brad Keselowski's #8 machine.
No time table for a return is known at this time, but doctors believe it'll be a minimum of 3-4 weeks.
Riggs has a win on the season at Mexico City, which under the new championship format currently has him locked into the Chase for the Sprint Cup, which he could still make if he can be in the top 30 in points at regular season end, and as long as there aren't more than 16 winners with him on the wrong end of a points battle of 1 win drivers. Currently, Riggs sits 13th in points, 97 points ahead of 31st place Regan Smith. Luckily, next week's race is the All-Star Race at Homestead, which will burn up a week of Riggs' recovery without losing any points.
The announced substitute driver for All-Star weekend is semi-retired veteran Jeff Burton, who just scored a strong 9th place finish in his first start of 2013 at Charlotte in a part time RCR entry. Unfortunately, Burton is not eligible to be locked into the All-Star Race, so the #10 team will have to run the All-Star Open and try to earn their way in all over again. While Stewart-Haas Racing is taking it one step at a time at this moment, Burton will "more than likely" be the driver at Dover and Michigan as well.
Video of the crash
submitted by seekerblackout to seekersnr2003series [link] [comments]
No time table for a return is known at this time, but doctors believe it'll be a minimum of 3-4 weeks.
Riggs has a win on the season at Mexico City, which under the new championship format currently has him locked into the Chase for the Sprint Cup, which he could still make if he can be in the top 30 in points at regular season end, and as long as there aren't more than 16 winners with him on the wrong end of a points battle of 1 win drivers. Currently, Riggs sits 13th in points, 97 points ahead of 31st place Regan Smith. Luckily, next week's race is the All-Star Race at Homestead, which will burn up a week of Riggs' recovery without losing any points.
The announced substitute driver for All-Star weekend is semi-retired veteran Jeff Burton, who just scored a strong 9th place finish in his first start of 2013 at Charlotte in a part time RCR entry. Unfortunately, Burton is not eligible to be locked into the All-Star Race, so the #10 team will have to run the All-Star Open and try to earn their way in all over again. While Stewart-Haas Racing is taking it one step at a time at this moment, Burton will "more than likely" be the driver at Dover and Michigan as well.
Video of the crash
2023.06.01 03:42 RAWR_XD42069 That 8 stolen bases tho
 | submitted by RAWR_XD42069 to Braves [link] [comments] |
2023.06.01 03:42 DumJoeMama Is this build good for gaming & basic blender modeling?
PCPartPicker Part List
submitted by DumJoeMama to buildapc [link] [comments]
| Type | Item | Price |
|---|---|---|
| CPU | AMD Ryzen 5 5600 3.5 GHz 6-Core Processor | $130.37 @ Amazon |
| CPU Cooler | Thermalright Assassin X 120 Refined SE 66.17 CFM CPU Cooler | $19.89 @ Amazon |
| Motherboard | MSI PRO B550M-VC WIFI Micro ATX AM4 Motherboard | $119.99 @ B&H |
| Memory | Silicon Power GAMING 32 GB (2 x 16 GB) DDR4-3200 CL16 Memory | $49.97 @ Amazon |
| Storage | TEAMGROUP T-Force Cardea Z44L 1 TB M.2-2280 PCIe 4.0 X4 NVME Solid State Drive | $35.99 @ Amazon |
| Video Card | MSI MECH 2X OC Radeon RX 6750 XT 12 GB Video Card | $329.99 |
| Case | Lian Li LANCOOL 205M MESH MicroATX Mini Tower Case | $79.98 @ Amazon |
| Power Supply | Corsair RM750e (2023) 750 W 80+ Gold Certified Fully Modular ATX Power Supply | $99.99 @ Best Buy |
| Prices include shipping, taxes, rebates, and discounts | ||
| Total | $866.17 | |
| Generated by PCPartPicker 2023-05-31 21:42 EDT-0400 |
2023.06.01 03:42 darthfyer The Clone Wars Complete Series Idea - 30th Anniversary Special Edition #CompleteTheCloneWars Spoilers
Disclaimer - I realise these ideas are probably thrown around time after time, but I wanted to voice my opinion on the potential future of The Clone Wars.
The Clone Wars 30th Anniversary [Star Wars 50th] - The animation is fully re-worked for the entire series to be uniform and be on par with season 7 or Bad Batch.
I realise that re-animating The Clone Wars in its entirety is more of a dream for me and would be an incredibly tall task. It’ll likely never happen. Along the lines of the original trilogy being re-released as special editions, this too could serve as a ‘special edition’ of The Clone Wars as the technology wasn’t available at the time - similar reason to why George updated the OT. No plot points would be changed in existing episodes ala Han and Greedo, just an upgraded visual appearance across the series. Maybe additional details added to the background, like characters or species that have been created since. This could also allow for additional stories to be included in earlier seasons and still aesthetically fit. It would also add more immersive visuals to existing episodes.
8 or 9 seasons. Every episode would be in timeline order. (In the first 4 seasons of The Clone Wars, there are episodes that aired out of order. Some of them several seasons apart from another.) The movie arc would also be incorporated in to season 1.
Existing stories not included in The Clone Wars. These are first priority:
Crystal Crisis on Utapau [This adds clarification to General Grievous’ hideout on Utapau. It also shows the initial intentions for Kyber crystals - later to be used for the Death Star.]
Son of Dathomir [This addresses where Maul has been before we see him in Season 7. It gives better clarity and flow to Maul’s story and the Shadow Collective.]
Dark Disciple [This addresses the conclusion of a core Clone Wars character. Asajj Ventress receives a concluding story that is otherwise not seen visually. While it was incorporated into a book, actual episodes would be crucial.]
Return to Mon Cala [there are canon inconsistencies with Nossor Ri, this arc needs to be reworked]
Return to the Jedi Temple [Inconsistencies with canon with Anakin/Vader. Vader later notes he never knew of the Sith shrine. This could be incorporated into the arc in a way that makes Anakin want to forget or simply made him forget. It otherwise needs to be reworked to not include Anakin. This arc could incorporate Grogu appearing in the background as well as some other Jedi that have been later revealed via flashbacks - Kelleran Bec, Jaro Tapal, etc.]
Yuuzahn Vong [The Yuuzahn Vong are currently not part of canon. So this arc may be best left behind or repurposed into a later series. Post Return of the Jedi ala OG Thrawn Trilogy?]
Bounty Hunter [This is canon due to Boba Fett’s helmet dent and further clarified by Cad Bane’s appearance in post order 66 canon stories. It’s crucial that this is made]
Kashyyyk [This would be a beautiful arc to see. It would also introduce the relationship Yoda has with the Wookiees]
Rex and R2 Top Gun [A fun arc that would be interesting to see realised.]
Additional stories or ideas I’d like to see. These are just stories I feel would help connect the established stories and characters of the ‘new canon’:
Maybe a Thrawn arc. To have visuals of Thrawn’s emergence and also Thrawn, Anakin and Padme on Batuu would be amazing. This has already been written by Timothy Zahn, but animated episodes would be great to see.
Maybe a General Grievous origin story. Not necessarily required, but would make a fascinating story. This wouldn’t have to be an arc, unless it’s incorporated into something else.
Possibly some sort of tie-in or reference to the High Republic? Maybe a throw away line that mentions the Hetzal system and the Legacy Run disaster (I realise that happened 200-300 years prior, but perhaps some sort of event happens and that is mentioned. It would be a great way to acknowledge the High Republic and confirm it is part of the history. Maybe a high Republic logo is seen somewhere in the background in the archives or something?
Maybe another Separatist oriented arc, showing the human side to the Separatists. Maybe Lux is involved? This was already explored, so this isn’t necessarily required.
Another story (not necessarily an arc) that would be nice to see, but not necessary, an origin story of Hera and Chopper. We see the crashed Y-Wing in Rebels, but that’s all we find out. A fleshed out story would be great to see.
An order 66 arc could show how the inquisitors are captured and turned. Not all of them, but maybe a select few? Maybe The Grand Inquisitor as a temple guard as well as another two or three Jedi.
Finally, I’d like to see a story of Barriss Offee and where she ended up. It’d be great to see her as an early inquisitor or some sort of enemy to the inquisitors?
The biggest pitfall with the new or unproduced arcs is the absenge of Tom Kane’s amazing voice talent. There are two ways to go about this. For Yularen and Yoda in particularly, the obvious would be to re-cast the voices. The other is to use the same technology that was used for The Mandalorian to bring back a certain character. The first is cheaper, but the second is more authentic. If a re-cast was to occur, Yularen would need to be incredibly near identical in my opinion.
What other stories would you like to see animated in a completed version of The Clone Wars?
submitted by darthfyer to TheCloneWars [link] [comments]
The Clone Wars 30th Anniversary [Star Wars 50th] - The animation is fully re-worked for the entire series to be uniform and be on par with season 7 or Bad Batch.
I realise that re-animating The Clone Wars in its entirety is more of a dream for me and would be an incredibly tall task. It’ll likely never happen. Along the lines of the original trilogy being re-released as special editions, this too could serve as a ‘special edition’ of The Clone Wars as the technology wasn’t available at the time - similar reason to why George updated the OT. No plot points would be changed in existing episodes ala Han and Greedo, just an upgraded visual appearance across the series. Maybe additional details added to the background, like characters or species that have been created since. This could also allow for additional stories to be included in earlier seasons and still aesthetically fit. It would also add more immersive visuals to existing episodes.
8 or 9 seasons. Every episode would be in timeline order. (In the first 4 seasons of The Clone Wars, there are episodes that aired out of order. Some of them several seasons apart from another.) The movie arc would also be incorporated in to season 1.
Existing stories not included in The Clone Wars. These are first priority:
Crystal Crisis on Utapau [This adds clarification to General Grievous’ hideout on Utapau. It also shows the initial intentions for Kyber crystals - later to be used for the Death Star.]
Son of Dathomir [This addresses where Maul has been before we see him in Season 7. It gives better clarity and flow to Maul’s story and the Shadow Collective.]
Dark Disciple [This addresses the conclusion of a core Clone Wars character. Asajj Ventress receives a concluding story that is otherwise not seen visually. While it was incorporated into a book, actual episodes would be crucial.]
Return to Mon Cala [there are canon inconsistencies with Nossor Ri, this arc needs to be reworked]
Return to the Jedi Temple [Inconsistencies with canon with Anakin/Vader. Vader later notes he never knew of the Sith shrine. This could be incorporated into the arc in a way that makes Anakin want to forget or simply made him forget. It otherwise needs to be reworked to not include Anakin. This arc could incorporate Grogu appearing in the background as well as some other Jedi that have been later revealed via flashbacks - Kelleran Bec, Jaro Tapal, etc.]
Yuuzahn Vong [The Yuuzahn Vong are currently not part of canon. So this arc may be best left behind or repurposed into a later series. Post Return of the Jedi ala OG Thrawn Trilogy?]
Bounty Hunter [This is canon due to Boba Fett’s helmet dent and further clarified by Cad Bane’s appearance in post order 66 canon stories. It’s crucial that this is made]
Kashyyyk [This would be a beautiful arc to see. It would also introduce the relationship Yoda has with the Wookiees]
Rex and R2 Top Gun [A fun arc that would be interesting to see realised.]
Additional stories or ideas I’d like to see. These are just stories I feel would help connect the established stories and characters of the ‘new canon’:
Maybe a Thrawn arc. To have visuals of Thrawn’s emergence and also Thrawn, Anakin and Padme on Batuu would be amazing. This has already been written by Timothy Zahn, but animated episodes would be great to see.
Maybe a General Grievous origin story. Not necessarily required, but would make a fascinating story. This wouldn’t have to be an arc, unless it’s incorporated into something else.
Possibly some sort of tie-in or reference to the High Republic? Maybe a throw away line that mentions the Hetzal system and the Legacy Run disaster (I realise that happened 200-300 years prior, but perhaps some sort of event happens and that is mentioned. It would be a great way to acknowledge the High Republic and confirm it is part of the history. Maybe a high Republic logo is seen somewhere in the background in the archives or something?
Maybe another Separatist oriented arc, showing the human side to the Separatists. Maybe Lux is involved? This was already explored, so this isn’t necessarily required.
Another story (not necessarily an arc) that would be nice to see, but not necessary, an origin story of Hera and Chopper. We see the crashed Y-Wing in Rebels, but that’s all we find out. A fleshed out story would be great to see.
An order 66 arc could show how the inquisitors are captured and turned. Not all of them, but maybe a select few? Maybe The Grand Inquisitor as a temple guard as well as another two or three Jedi.
Finally, I’d like to see a story of Barriss Offee and where she ended up. It’d be great to see her as an early inquisitor or some sort of enemy to the inquisitors?
The biggest pitfall with the new or unproduced arcs is the absenge of Tom Kane’s amazing voice talent. There are two ways to go about this. For Yularen and Yoda in particularly, the obvious would be to re-cast the voices. The other is to use the same technology that was used for The Mandalorian to bring back a certain character. The first is cheaper, but the second is more authentic. If a re-cast was to occur, Yularen would need to be incredibly near identical in my opinion.
What other stories would you like to see animated in a completed version of The Clone Wars?
2023.06.01 03:41 ProserpinaFC Recommendations on Arctic Circle information, especially climate and oceanography, expedition history, and just really weird facts
I'm writing a fantasy that takes place in a terraformed Arctic Circle, set about 1890-1940s. That part is tangential. Also, magical. Sea turtle gods willed it. We don't need to discuss that.
I want to do a big fat Arctic Circle literature review, but it's a bit difficult when so much information I find focuses on climate change and other modern issues.
Do you know of books or websites about Arctic geography? Or just any Arctic trivia you'd like to share?
Some things I've noted so far are:
1) Since the Atlantic literally flows into the middle of the Arctic Ocean through the Fram Strait near Greenland, I want the capital of this nation to be within this third. But, since almost all the freshwater rivers are Russian, I want the most population to be agricultural and living in that third. I don't know anything about the last third above Alaska besides that it is melting. Is there anything distinctive about the McKenzie side of the Arctic?
2) How else does the Arctic affect ocean and climate besides "big icebergs good, small icebergs bad"?
3) From what I understand of tectonic plates, the Earth has one big crack down the middle called the Atlantic Ocean that is spreading the plates apart and on the opposite side the Ring of Fire around the Pacific Ocean is trash compacting crust back inward. Does any of that change at the top of the planet? From maps it looks like the splitting of the plate stops in a curve above Siberia? Seismic maps look crazy. Would a country located in these areas be highly active? (Would it have more earthquakes than Japan? :D)
4) The elephants in the room -- the seasons and the temperature -- Is what I researched first and addressed in this being a fantasy story. But if you have any information anyway, I'd love to have it. I'm not going to look a gift horse in the mouth.
5) If I had to choose 2-3 expeditions to read about and understand how people survived travelling through the circle, which should I focus on? I also need to read more about native peoples, so any indigenous references would be appreciated, too. What's the biggest failure or disaster in Arctic history? ... Besides the Titanic.
submitted by ProserpinaFC to geography [link] [comments]
I want to do a big fat Arctic Circle literature review, but it's a bit difficult when so much information I find focuses on climate change and other modern issues.
Do you know of books or websites about Arctic geography? Or just any Arctic trivia you'd like to share?
Some things I've noted so far are:
1) Since the Atlantic literally flows into the middle of the Arctic Ocean through the Fram Strait near Greenland, I want the capital of this nation to be within this third. But, since almost all the freshwater rivers are Russian, I want the most population to be agricultural and living in that third. I don't know anything about the last third above Alaska besides that it is melting. Is there anything distinctive about the McKenzie side of the Arctic?
2) How else does the Arctic affect ocean and climate besides "big icebergs good, small icebergs bad"?
3) From what I understand of tectonic plates, the Earth has one big crack down the middle called the Atlantic Ocean that is spreading the plates apart and on the opposite side the Ring of Fire around the Pacific Ocean is trash compacting crust back inward. Does any of that change at the top of the planet? From maps it looks like the splitting of the plate stops in a curve above Siberia? Seismic maps look crazy. Would a country located in these areas be highly active? (Would it have more earthquakes than Japan? :D)
4) The elephants in the room -- the seasons and the temperature -- Is what I researched first and addressed in this being a fantasy story. But if you have any information anyway, I'd love to have it. I'm not going to look a gift horse in the mouth.
5) If I had to choose 2-3 expeditions to read about and understand how people survived travelling through the circle, which should I focus on? I also need to read more about native peoples, so any indigenous references would be appreciated, too. What's the biggest failure or disaster in Arctic history? ... Besides the Titanic.
2023.06.01 03:41 PhilsBot The Phillies fell to the Mets by a score of 4-1 - Wed, May 31 @ 07:10 PM EDT
Phillies @ Mets - Wed, May 31
Game Status: Game Over - Score: 4-1 Mets
Links & Info
| Phillies Batters | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K | LOB | AVG | OBP | SLG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stott - 2B | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .290 | .325 | .403 |
| 2 | Turner - SS | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | .236 | .280 | .371 |
| 3 | Harper - DH | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | .315 | .410 | .483 |
| 4 | Castellanos, N - RF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | .290 | .338 | .453 |
| 5 | Schwarber - LF | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .163 | .318 | .395 |
| 6 | Realmuto - C | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | .257 | .307 | .423 |
| 7 | Marsh - CF | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .274 | .374 | .478 |
| 8 | Clemens - 1B | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .268 | .333 | .479 |
| 9 | Sosa, E - 3B | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | .261 | .282 | .420 |
| Totals | 35 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 16 |
| Phillies |
|---|
| BATTING: 2B: Marsh (9, Carrasco). HR: Sosa, E (4, 3rd inning off Carrasco, 0 on, 0 out). TB: Clemens 2; Harper 2; Marsh 3; Sosa, E 4; Stott 2. RBI: Sosa, E (12). Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Stott; Clemens; Turner; Castellanos, N; Realmuto. Team RISP: 0-for-7. Team LOB: 9. |
| Mets Batters | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K | LOB | AVG | OBP | SLG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nimmo - CF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | .294 | .379 | .435 |
| 2 | Lindor - SS | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .223 | .294 | .427 |
| 3 | McNeil - 2B | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .288 | .364 | .359 |
| 4 | Alonso - 1B | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .238 | .333 | .552 |
| 5 | Baty - 3B | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .239 | .313 | .385 |
| 6 | Marte, S - RF | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .246 | .311 | .313 |
| 7 | Vogelbach - DH | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | .219 | .364 | .314 |
| 8 | Canha - LF | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .242 | .324 | .386 |
| 9 | Nido - C | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .130 | .158 | .130 |
| Totals | 29 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Mets |
|---|
| BATTING: HR: Canha (4, 3rd inning off Nola, Aa, 1 on, 0 out). TB: Alonso; Canha 5; McNeil; Nido. RBI: Canha 4 (16). 2-out RBI: Canha 2. Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Nido. Team RISP: 1-for-3. Team LOB: 4. |
| FIELDING: DP: (Lindor-Alonso). |
| Phillies Pitchers | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | P-S | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nola, Aa (L, 4-4) | 6.0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 103-65 | 4.70 |
| Domínguez | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16-9 | 3.86 |
| Vasquez | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9-7 | 1.42 |
| Totals | 8.0 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 1 |
| Mets Pitchers | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | P-S | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrasco (W, 2-2) | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 82-52 | 5.74 |
| Raley, B (H, 12) | 1.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 23-18 | 2.95 |
| Ottavino (H, 7) | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-6 | 4.22 |
| Robertson (S, 10) | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 22-16 | 1.48 |
| Totals | 9.0 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 |
| Game Info |
|---|
| HBP: Clemens (by Robertson). |
| Pitches-strikes: Nola, Aa 103-65; Domínguez 16-9; Vasquez 9-7; Carrasco 82-52; Raley, B 23-18; Ottavino 6-6; Robertson 22-16. |
| Groundouts-flyouts: Nola, Aa 3-3; Domínguez 1-0; Vasquez 1-1; Carrasco 8-4; Raley, B 1-0; Ottavino 0-1; Robertson 0-1. |
| Batters faced: Nola, Aa 25; Domínguez 4; Vasquez 3; Carrasco 24; Raley, B 6; Ottavino 2; Robertson 5. |
| Umpires: HP: Chris Guccione. 1B: Tripp Gibson. 2B: Edwin Jimenez. 3B: Edwin Moscoso. |
| Weather: 69 degrees, Clear. |
| Wind: 7 mph, Out To LF. |
| First pitch: 7:10 PM. |
| T: 2:29. |
| Att: 39,641. |
| Venue: Citi Field. |
| May 31, 2023 |
| Inning | Scoring Play | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Top 3 | Edmundo Sosa homers (4) on a line drive to left center field. | 1-0 PHI |
| Bottom 3 | Mark Canha homers (4) on a fly ball to left center field. Daniel Vogelbach scores. | 2-1 NYM |
| Bottom 4 | Mark Canha singles on a line drive to right fielder Nick Castellanos. Pete Alonso scores. Brett Baty scores. Daniel Vogelbach to 2nd. | 4-1 NYM |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phillies | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | |
| Mets | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
Decisions
- Winner: Carlos Carrasco (2-2, 5.74)
- Loser: Aaron Nola (4-4, 4.70)
- Save: David Robertson (10, 1.48)
Division Scoreboard
ATL 4 @ OAK 2 - FinalWSH 10 @ LAD 6 - Final
SD 1 @ MIA 2 - Final
Next Phillies Game: Thu, Jun 01, 01:10 PM EDT @ Mets
Posted: 05/31/2023 09:40:57 PM EDT
2023.06.01 03:40 nickyzhere Help identify an extra
Ok, this is driving me crazy. In season 1, episode 2 the crew hires an actor to pose as a boyfriend to get “Kevin” jealous, and the actor looks so familiar! Anyone able to identify him?
submitted by nickyzhere to undercoverunderage [link] [comments]
2023.06.01 03:40 NewYorkMetsBot2 POST GAME THREAD: The Mets defeated the Phillies by a score of 4-1 - Wed, May 31 @ 07:10 PM EDT
Phillies @ Mets - Wed, May 31
Game Status: Game Over - Score: 4-1 Mets
Links & Info
| Phillies Batters | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K | LOB | AVG | OBP | SLG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stott - 2B | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .290 | .325 | .403 |
| 2 | Turner - SS | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | .236 | .280 | .371 |
| 3 | Harper - DH | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | .315 | .410 | .483 |
| 4 | Castellanos, N - RF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | .290 | .338 | .453 |
| 5 | Schwarber - LF | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .163 | .318 | .395 |
| 6 | Realmuto - C | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | .257 | .307 | .423 |
| 7 | Marsh - CF | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .274 | .374 | .478 |
| 8 | Clemens - 1B | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .268 | .333 | .479 |
| 9 | Sosa, E - 3B | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 4 | .261 | .282 | .420 |
| Totals | 35 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 16 |
| Phillies |
|---|
| BATTING: 2B: Marsh (9, Carrasco). HR: Sosa, E (4, 3rd inning off Carrasco, 0 on, 0 out). TB: Clemens 2; Harper 2; Marsh 3; Sosa, E 4; Stott 2. RBI: Sosa, E (12). Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Stott; Clemens; Turner; Castellanos, N; Realmuto. Team RISP: 0-for-7. Team LOB: 9. |
| Mets Batters | AB | R | H | RBI | BB | K | LOB | AVG | OBP | SLG | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nimmo - CF | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | .294 | .379 | .435 |
| 2 | Lindor - SS | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .223 | .294 | .427 |
| 3 | McNeil - 2B | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | .288 | .364 | .359 |
| 4 | Alonso - 1B | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | .238 | .333 | .552 |
| 5 | Baty - 3B | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | .239 | .313 | .385 |
| 6 | Marte, S - RF | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .246 | .311 | .313 |
| 7 | Vogelbach - DH | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | .219 | .364 | .314 |
| 8 | Canha - LF | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | .242 | .324 | .386 |
| 9 | Nido - C | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | .130 | .158 | .130 |
| Totals | 29 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 7 |
| Mets |
|---|
| BATTING: HR: Canha (4, 3rd inning off Nola, Aa, 1 on, 0 out). TB: Alonso; Canha 5; McNeil; Nido. RBI: Canha 4 (16). 2-out RBI: Canha 2. Runners left in scoring position, 2 out: Nido. Team RISP: 1-for-3. Team LOB: 4. |
| FIELDING: DP: (Lindor-Alonso). |
| Phillies Pitchers | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | P-S | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nola, Aa (L, 4-4) | 6.0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 103-65 | 4.70 |
| Domínguez | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16-9 | 3.86 |
| Vasquez | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9-7 | 1.42 |
| Totals | 8.0 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 1 |
| Mets Pitchers | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR | P-S | ERA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carrasco (W, 2-2) | 6.0 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 82-52 | 5.74 |
| Raley, B (H, 12) | 1.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 23-18 | 2.95 |
| Ottavino (H, 7) | 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 6-6 | 4.22 |
| Robertson (S, 10) | 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 22-16 | 1.48 |
| Totals | 9.0 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 1 |
| Game Info |
|---|
| HBP: Clemens (by Robertson). |
| Pitches-strikes: Nola, Aa 103-65; Domínguez 16-9; Vasquez 9-7; Carrasco 82-52; Raley, B 23-18; Ottavino 6-6; Robertson 22-16. |
| Groundouts-flyouts: Nola, Aa 3-3; Domínguez 1-0; Vasquez 1-1; Carrasco 8-4; Raley, B 1-0; Ottavino 0-1; Robertson 0-1. |
| Batters faced: Nola, Aa 25; Domínguez 4; Vasquez 3; Carrasco 24; Raley, B 6; Ottavino 2; Robertson 5. |
| Umpires: HP: Chris Guccione. 1B: Tripp Gibson. 2B: Edwin Jimenez. 3B: Edwin Moscoso. |
| Weather: 69 degrees, Clear. |
| Wind: 7 mph, Out To LF. |
| First pitch: 7:10 PM. |
| T: 2:29. |
| Att: 39,641. |
| Venue: Citi Field. |
| May 31, 2023 |
| Inning | Scoring Play | Score |
|---|---|---|
| Top 3 | Edmundo Sosa homers (4) on a line drive to left center field. | 1-0 PHI |
| Bottom 3 | Mark Canha homers (4) on a fly ball to left center field. Daniel Vogelbach scores. | 2-1 NYM |
| Bottom 4 | Mark Canha singles on a line drive to right fielder Nick Castellanos. Pete Alonso scores. Brett Baty scores. Daniel Vogelbach to 2nd. | 4-1 NYM |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R | H | E | LOB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phillies | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | |
| Mets | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
Decisions
- Winner: Carlos Carrasco (2-2, 5.74)
- Loser: Aaron Nola (4-4, 4.70)
- Save: David Robertson (10, 1.48)
Division Scoreboard
ATL 4 @ OAK 2 - FinalWSH 10 @ LAD 6 - Final
SD 1 @ MIA 2 - Final
Next Mets Game: Thu, Jun 01, 01:10 PM EDT vs. Phillies
Posted: 05/31/2023 09:40:28 PM EDT
2023.06.01 03:40 AutoModerator [Download Course] Jason Wardrop – Real Estate Agency Accelerator (Genkicourses.com)
![[Download Course] Jason Wardrop – Real Estate Agency Accelerator (Genkicourses.com)](https://external-preview.redd.it/tWKDtWgD8B15_uITMt64DVOmmqRVN_KvxyVMB2Lr7f4.jpg?width=640&crop=smart&auto=webp&s=9d6ad2c405ae5f789e67fb9f57851aadd378d67c "[Download Course] Jason Wardrop – Real Estate Agency Accelerator (Genkicourses.com)") | submitted by AutoModerator to QualityCourses2k23 [link] [comments] Get the course here: [Download Course] Jason Wardrop – Real Estate Agency Accelerator Our website: https://www.genkicourses.site/product/jason-wardrop-real-estate-agency-accelerato What You Get:Real Estate AGENCY ACCELERATORGet My Step-by-Step Blueprint that will take you from newbie to a 6 and even 7-figure income level with your own Real Estate ‘SaaS’ Agency.Weekly Group CoachingJump in our Weekly LIVE Zoom Coaching Calls and ask your questions directly to Jason or one of our 7-Figure Earning coaches! Get direct access to coaching that will create real results!Bonus #1: $1M ARR Client Acquisition FunnelClone My Completely ‘Done-For-You’ Sales Funnel I Used To Make Over $1M! Just Swap Out Your Logo & Connect Your Stripe Account And That’s It!Bonus #2: ‘Behind The Scenes’ Facebook AdsI will show you inside my Facebook Ads account that has spent over $1M on ads & generated +150k leads for my agency. See Real Results From A Real Business!Bonus #3: YouTube Celebrity AcceleratorDiscover how to start and grow your own YouTube channel so you can generate free leads & sales on demand and become an online celebrity!Bonus #4: Client Acceleration MasterclassInside the Client Acceleration Masterclass I’ll share with you my best strategies for getting new clients at scale with any type of budget. I’ll also give you my proven ad templates & funnel templates that crush it!Bonus #5: White Label Onboarding VideosSupport Your Clients With Our Pre-Made Onboarding Videos To Save You HOURS Of Time & Help Get Your Clients Quick ResultsBonus #6: $100K Case StudiesGet a ‘behind-the-scenes’ look at what our Top Members are doing to see amazing results!Bonus #7: $5/HR VA ProspectingGet The Full Training & Outreach Templates To Find & Train VA’s To Handle Much Of Your Prospecting For You.@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ If you're wondering why our courses are priced lower than the original prices and are feeling a bit suspicious (which is understandable), we can provide proof of the course's contents. We can provide a screenshot of the course's contents or send you a freebie, such as an introduction video or another video from the course, to prove that we do have the course. Should you wish to request proof, we kindly ask you to reach out to us. Please be aware that our courses do not include community access. This is due to the fact that we do not have the authority to manage this feature. Despite our desire to incorporate this aspect, it is, unfortunately, unfeasible. Explore affordable learning at Genkicourses.site 🎓! Dive into a world of quality courses handpicked just for you. Download, watch, and achieve more without breaking your budget. |
2023.06.01 03:39 West-Wrong School List Suggestions (Low MCAT)
After careful thought and evaluations and discussions with my family and other mentors, I’ve decided to proceed with applying this cycle with my 501 MCAT score (124/126/126/125), so I’d like some insight into school list suggestions that are broad and low-tier focused.
Some information about me:
State: NY residence (SES disadvantaged, ORM)
cGPA/sGPA: 3.68/3.48 (T10, Ivy)
Clinical hours: 1000+ hours
Non-clinical hours: 700+ hours (including creating a community-based organization focused on health literacy)
Research: 2000+ hours (8 clinical pubs, including 1 first-author pub and one in a journal that has the highest impact factor for the field of my research; multiple conference abstracts that I’ve co-authored, presented in three international and national conferences for my first-author abstracts that I got awards for)
I know that for my case, luck will probably play the biggest factor because of my low stats, but I want to take the jump and see where I land, but I also want to believe that my score doesn’t define me completely. I have essentially all other parts of my application completed and people have already been sending in their letters (1 from PI, 1 from MD I’m shadowing, 2 science faculty + committee letter).
Right now, all I can think of my are my state MD schools (Downstate and Upstate). I’m more inclined in applying to MD schools this cycle. I’d appreciate any and all advice you have for me regarding the school list. I want to apply broadly and early.
submitted by West-Wrong to premed [link] [comments]
Some information about me:
State: NY residence (SES disadvantaged, ORM)
cGPA/sGPA: 3.68/3.48 (T10, Ivy)
Clinical hours: 1000+ hours
Non-clinical hours: 700+ hours (including creating a community-based organization focused on health literacy)
Research: 2000+ hours (8 clinical pubs, including 1 first-author pub and one in a journal that has the highest impact factor for the field of my research; multiple conference abstracts that I’ve co-authored, presented in three international and national conferences for my first-author abstracts that I got awards for)
I know that for my case, luck will probably play the biggest factor because of my low stats, but I want to take the jump and see where I land, but I also want to believe that my score doesn’t define me completely. I have essentially all other parts of my application completed and people have already been sending in their letters (1 from PI, 1 from MD I’m shadowing, 2 science faculty + committee letter).
Right now, all I can think of my are my state MD schools (Downstate and Upstate). I’m more inclined in applying to MD schools this cycle. I’d appreciate any and all advice you have for me regarding the school list. I want to apply broadly and early.
2023.06.01 03:37 P-man1001 [ALL][Totk][AoC] I keep seeing people talk about a certain plot element in TotK, but this plot element was also elaborated on in Age of Calamity, and I am now confused.
Time travel is never pretty and is rarely done well in any sort of media, and TotK seems like no exception on the surface. However, with AoC, I thought it was established that going back in time does not change the future, but instead creates a new timeline. I know that some may not consider AoC canon as it is a spin-off, but I personally believe it is canon as I don't think Nintendo ever said the contrary, but feel free to correct me if I am wrong. Also, I would think Nintendo would have the basic plot of TotK laid out already when AoC came out and would not have anything that contradicts BotW nor its sequel in the spin-off. This may be going into head-canon territory, but could it be possible that TotK is not a closed loop? From what I recall, all murals in the beginning depicting Zelda were covered by debris, so we don't see Zelda's fate before-hand. Also, Rauru states Zelda came from a timeline where a version of her did not travel to the past, and I don't think Nintendo would tell us something like that if it weren't true, but that is just my opinion. Now, I am going to address the dragon-sized elephant in the room which comes in the form of the Light Dragon and Ganondorf's words in the beginning. If Zelda went back in time and created a new timeline, then the Light Dragon would not be present in the game, nor would Ganondorf recognize Link and Zelda when he reawakens. I thought of three possible explanations for this:
submitted by P-man1001 to zelda [link] [comments]
- Zelda went back in time and changed the timeline in such a way that she doesn't cause a timeline split entirely and instead causes ripple to echo through the ages. In the original timeline, perhaps the damage done by Ganondorf was more catastrophic, leaving nary a trace of the Zonai civilization nor Ancient Hyrule left. However, when Zelda goes back in time, her and Mineru concoct a plan a plan to raise the Zonai ruins we see in the game high into the sky (I may be misremembering this, so correct me if I am wrong) and for Zelda in her dragon form to be out of sight from the denizens of Hyrule, only to be revealed when Ganondorf reawakens, thus not really altering the present too much. However, there are some minor differences Zelda causes to the timeline which could explain some of the games minor inconsistencies with BotW such as some people not remembering Link. Now, this is what makes the most sense to me personally given what we have been shown previously, but I know this is probably just complete head-canon and does not really explain Ganondorf's words in the beginning.
- It is a closed loop as many people have said. I can't jive with this though. This brings into question the concept of destiny and whether characters have any sort of free will at all, and I really just don't want to think about that. It also contradicts how time travel works in AoC.
- Zelda went back in time, created an entirely new timeline, then somehow the timeline where Zelda was in the past and the timeline we experienced in BotW have merged. This merger could have been brought about by Zelda herself, but most likely subconsciously. I think the game makes it pretty clear that Zelda's magical capabilities are vast, but she still does not have full control over it yet, as shown when Zelda unintentionally creates a miniature time portal for the Master Sword to travel through. Perhaps the merger came about as a side effect of her becoming a dragon? This scenario does not have as much proof to back it up, so I personally think this is the least likely to be the case, but I am still curious what you guys think.
2023.06.01 03:36 Wraithdagger12 #SVTFOEdailyChallenge Season 3a - New season, new evils, new mysteries
 | submitted by Wraithdagger12 to StarVStheForcesofEvil [link] [comments] Who are the real villains? Them? Or Eclipsa? Extremely overdue, but here are my thoughts/notes I took while rewatching the show the past few months! This is Season 3a, which I have arbitrarily cut off at episode 11, right before things started getting hot. Note that not all episodes have notes, because I didn't really have any new thoughts about them. Also included are bits of conversation I had with folks on the WTWC Discord. I might make some more in-depth posts about some things if I feel like it. If you have any of your own thoughts, feel free to share them below. Anyway, enjoy! Return to Mewni
|
2023.06.01 03:36 SunnyRedhead Question about romancing John
So I romanced Lawrence and was loyal all season 1. Then in season 2 I romanced Blaine but I broke up with him. Do these choices lock me out of the opportunity to romance John in season 3? Thank you
submitted by SunnyRedhead to RomanceClub [link] [comments]
2023.06.01 03:36 GabuGemu Demon Slayer season 3 episode 6 Filipino/ Pinoy Reaction DI NA NAGBIBIRO SI HANTENGU!!!
 | Permission to share submitted by GabuGemu to DemonSlayerAnime [link] [comments] Hantengus form reveal 😨 |
2023.06.01 03:35 Duranel Motherboard doesn't have any RGB pins
Hello all. I got the B550M board, but the version I apparently got, the 1.5 (assuming because it looks like the 1.5 rather than 1.4/1.7 or any others- I can't find the 3 pin RGB for my case's lights. Did they send me a version of a board without lights, when the more up to date version does, or is it hidden somewhere and I'm missing it?
https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/B550M-DS3H-rev-15/support#support-manual
submitted by Duranel to buildapc [link] [comments]
https://www.gigabyte.com/Motherboard/B550M-DS3H-rev-15/support#support-manual
2023.06.01 03:35 SuccessNo1474 Problems with my weight, weight loss help (?)
 | This is going to be a long post, and I would appreciate if you would read the whole thing before suggesting advice if you plan to do so, thanks in advance :) I will also try to respond to all the comments so feel free to ask questions. submitted by SuccessNo1474 to Healthygamergg [link] [comments] My weight has been a struggle for me for my entire life. I'm 18 years old, and I think the first time I remember having thoughts about my weight was when I was ~6. I was and continue to be decently athletic despite my weight, which for a long time when I was little meant that me being heavy was interpreted as being "bulky" rather than fat. My minor league baseball coach called me the "gentle giant", if that helps to paint a picture. I think the way I was perceived made me think that being heavy wasn't a bad thing for a long time, but as I started to get into middle school, being big started to become a more negative trait for me. It's worth mentioning that I grew up in a very accepting family and community, so I have very very rarely (not never) been directly called fat or in any way shamed for my weight. Both my parents are overweight. But as anyone who is or has been overweight understands, it doesn't take people saying something to your face to feel the shame of being overweight. I have this perception that society views overweight people as being too lazy to take active steps to becoming healthier, but I know from my own experience that this is not the case, as I'll explain more later. Going through middle school, my weight, and thus my attractiveness started to influence my social behaviors, and this constant internal battle I had with my self about my weight and image really pained me. Years went on like this. I wore (and continue to wear) baggy clothing and sweatshirts and slouched all the time to hide my stomach and chest. I still do all this stuff even when I'm alone. Despite this negative self image, I tried as hard as a 14 year old can to be sociable and outgoing, and this worked well for me for a long time. Still kinda does. But underneath this positive image I would still get out of the shower and look at my body in the mirror, disgusted with what I saw. I even started working out regularly, doing CrossFit 3 days a week after school, but my eating problems continued. I didn't even realize my eating habits. I should mention that I was never severely overweight to the point that it physically inhibited me. I was big boned in the truest sense of the phrase. I was still able to have a few girlfriends and romantic interests (if you want to call them that in 7th-10th grade), and though I was clearly overweight, I never discussed it with literally anyone. Then the covid lockdowns started. Being an introverted person, I was kind of in my element stuck at home for months, but spending all day at home meant unlimited access to food, and you've heard this story before. I was 16 at the time and went from ~210 lbs to over 250 lbs (6'1 male). Shit was awful dude. But I think that at least part of the reason I put up with all my weight gain is that it never interfered directly with my life. I always had a lot of energy for sports, sure, I wasn't the fastest but I could do any outdoor activities I wanted to for as long as I wanted. And this has never changed (I say as a teenager). One day, on December 3rd, 2020, my mom told me that she had just started using Noom, which is a pretty comprehensive weight loss program, and she asked me if I wanted to try it too. I'm not sure what made me say yes, had she asked me a different day I might have said no, but regardless, I did say yes. It was ~$200. I'm from an upper middle class family so $200, while a lot, was not an enormous amount of money, but as it turned out, the desire to not waste that money was the proverbial straw that broke the camel's back. Years of shame, guilt, and self hatred combined with this $200 incentive finally incited me to begin my weight loss journey. I stepped on the scale the next morning, and it read 253.6 lbs. My goal was 180 lbs, a number comfortably in my healthy BMI. And I went at it with a level of discipline and persistence that I, to this day, have never matched. I weighed myself every morning, I learned about calorie intake, I learned about calorie density, leptin, ghrelin, eating habits, and the weight began to fall off. In a week, I had lost 8 pounds (most of which was "water weight", ik). In a month, 15. and this went on and on. I didn't tell any friends or non-immediate family that I was loosing weight, just my girlfriend, and I think it's worth a moment telling her story, too. My girlfriend and I had gotten together summer of 2020, and she had just lost over the past year a mind boggling 80 pounds. While she was at her lightest, I was at my heaviest, and she and I had long discussions about weight loss, her telling me about her journey through it and in her positive, genuine character, encouraging me to to the same (though she made it very clear she had no expectation of me). I'll come back to this in a bit. I had gotten into a really good routine over the months, losing weight in a steady, consistent, and healthy manner. By the time I had lost like 30 pounds, I was starting to get the occasional comment on my weight loss, and I know to some people (my gf included) that can be a really hard thing to hear, that felt so fucking good. I began to gain a confidence in myself that I had never felt before and allowed me the courage to get into some social situations that I am benefitting from to this day. By the winter of 2021, I was at 195 pounds, and I looked the best I had in my entire life. But the title wouldn't be what it is if everything stayed that way. There is this really depressing statistic, that I sometimes wish I didn't know, but I understand why this is the case now. Maybe don't read this if you're losing or want to lose weight: The vast majority of people who lose large amounts of weight eventually gain it back. My gf (an exercise physiology major) told me this when she heard it in a lecture, but here's a source>! from Michigan University if you want one.!< I think about this a lot, but honestly don't know what killed my momentum. I had logged calories for all my meals just about every day until I had to go to a few summer camps (I had been going to these for years) so maybe it was that I couldn't log my meals on my phone there. Whatever the case, I stopped weighing myself every day and for the first time in nearly a year, the times I weighed myself every week or so, my weight began to trend upwards. Upwards and upwards. That shame and guilt began to return, but that wasn't enough to stop me from eating. Not worrying about calories and food in general was such a liberating feeling and it managed to triumph over the negative feelings that followed. Weeks, and then months would pass this way, punctuated by a few weeks of downward momentum as I tried to get back on the boat, but it wasn't enough. Sometimes, I'd lose as much as 20 lbs, just to gain it back and more in a month or two. By January of 2022, I was 235 lbs. I had a good run from Apr 11 of 2023 (231 lbs) to May 3 (224 lbs) but despite that, today I sit at 244.1 lbs. My gf has also gained back all her weight, and today we came to a mutual understanding that this time we're going to stop the upwards trend, and lose weight together. We've tried this before. But I'm really starting to get sick of this. Here's what my journey so far looks like: I wish I could describe the way looking at this graph feels. Not good. So, HealthyGamerGG friends, I come to you in an hour of real personal struggle. I'm not here for solutions, this issue is so complex no single reddit post could capture every aspect of my problem. But maybe you have some personal insight into a situation like mine that you'd be willing to share. Dr K if you're reading this, your videos and community have helped me immensely in the past few months, without your platform I would not have the ability or insight to write this post. This took a lot of time, thinking, and reflecting to write. Thank you for reading. |
2023.06.01 03:35 circleoftheworldpod News Coverage
Hello everyone, we wanted to touch base with the community and let you all know that we will be adding any news coverage to our list of things to talk about with the First Law. There really hasn't been much news for anything since we started this podcast, even when it comes to Joe's progress reports he isn't writing First Law right now sooooo. Any ways a movie will bring insane attention to our community so just wanted to let everyone know we will do our best to be a PEEELAR OF NEEEWWS. You'll probably find most stuff on Youtube and you can hear the Adeptus Historical's initial thoughts on the movie announcement down below. Since Reddit will be where many will come will we try and spread the good news on other platforms as well haha!
As for news for us:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bt9d-ktK1j8
submitted by circleoftheworldpod to TheFirstLaw [link] [comments]
As for news for us:
- Sorry for great northern war part 3 delays, can't complain about taking a vacation but man it throws you off.
- We are very thankful for all of you for your support and for reaching out to us more recently it means alot to us!
- Any new comers or I've read the series non stop for 10 years types feel free to reach out to us about anything concerning First Law, it is our forte after all.
- We are coming up on one year guys its crazy!! We will hopefully be coming out with a special focused on this possible movie for our anniversary!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bt9d-ktK1j8
2023.06.01 03:35 GabuGemu Demon Slayer season 3 episode 6 Filipino/ Pinoy Reaction DI NA NAGBIBIRO SI HANTENGU!!!
| | Permission to share 👋 submitted by GabuGemu to KimetsuNoYaiba [link] [comments] Hantengus form reveal 😨 |
2023.06.01 03:34 canyonnerd school list help!
Got my MCAT score back today and wanted to get some thoughts on the list I've been working on, stats below, TIA!
GPA/MCAT
AMCAS cGPA/sGPA - 3.2/3.0 (this includes post bacc work)
Master's GPA - 3.9
Post bacc 23cr, all upper div science- 4.0
MCAT 524, 132/128/132/132
Clinical Experience 3400 hrs as an RN, 1000 as a CNA
Non-clinical Volunteering 200 hours, after school program for kids
Shadowing 20 hours in primary care
Other 115 hours across different teaching/tutoring type roles- working w/ both high school kids and college students
School List I am limited to applying only in the midwest!
In-state 1
In-state 2
Western Michigan (Stryker)
Wayne State
Central Michigan
Rosalind Franklin
University of Minnesota
Indiana University School of Medicine
Oakland Beaumont
Rush University
University of Illinois
University of Iowa- Carver
Des Moines University College of Osteopathic Medicine
Marian University College of Osteopathic Medicine
Midwestern University Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine
Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine
Reach schools Ann Arbor, Ohio State University, and Case Western?
submitted by canyonnerd to premed [link] [comments]
GPA/MCAT
AMCAS cGPA/sGPA - 3.2/3.0 (this includes post bacc work)
Master's GPA - 3.9
Post bacc 23cr, all upper div science- 4.0
MCAT 524, 132/128/132/132
Clinical Experience 3400 hrs as an RN, 1000 as a CNA
Non-clinical Volunteering 200 hours, after school program for kids
Shadowing 20 hours in primary care
Other 115 hours across different teaching/tutoring type roles- working w/ both high school kids and college students
School List I am limited to applying only in the midwest!
In-state 1
In-state 2
Western Michigan (Stryker)
Wayne State
Central Michigan
Rosalind Franklin
University of Minnesota
Indiana University School of Medicine
Oakland Beaumont
Rush University
University of Illinois
University of Iowa- Carver
Des Moines University College of Osteopathic Medicine
Marian University College of Osteopathic Medicine
Midwestern University Chicago College of Osteopathic Medicine
Ohio University Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine
Reach schools Ann Arbor, Ohio State University, and Case Western?